7

There are a lot of Latin words that begin with se-. It adds the notion of being "apart" or "separated":

  • secerno
  • secludo
  • secubo
  • seduco
  • seiungo
  • sepono
  • etc.

The linked entry calls it an "inseparable prefix" meaning "aside / by itself." Wiktionary associates it with the reflexive pronoun se. There also seems to be a separate (apparently unrelated) meaning where se is a contraction of sine, e.g. securus = sine cura.

These options provoked some questions for me:

  • If se- is related to the reflexive pronoun, how do we make sense of the "apart" meaning?
  • If se- is a preposition, why does it only appear as a prefix? It reminds me of secus, but seems to have the opposite meaning.
  • I'd also be curious which (if any) version of se is related to semel and simplex etc: I could see the connection to "separated" but it's a bit of a stretch – Draconis May 29 '18 at 17:21
5

There is a (rare) preposition sēd, sē “without” with the ablative (as in Old Latin sed fraude), and (more commonly) a prefix sē- “without, apart from” (as in securus etc.), and also the conjunction sed “but”. The commonly accepted theory is that these derive from some case form (ablative?) of the reflexive pronoun IE *swe-, as in Latin se, suus. The semantic development would have been something along the lines of “on one’s own” > “without”.

  • Very helpful! Am I correct, then, to think that the derivation from the reflexive pronoun is pretty remote, and the closer association is to the obsolete preposition sēd, sē? – brianpck May 30 '18 at 13:37
  • @brianpck. Probably. – fdb May 30 '18 at 13:44

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.