A friend sent me this image:

Cat lying in Colosseum bed, pun on Caesar’ Laconism

Her question was simple: Is the Latin any good? The Latin indeed is good, and if one accepts the English to be in LOLcat, the English checks out as well.

However …

I also added a comment, that it would be even better were the long vowels marked (‘though many consider that to not be a necessity’), which is when I discovered that the expected vēnī, vīdī, *cōnvēnī, cōnsēdī did not match what the dictionary said: vēnī, vīdī, convēnī, cōnsēdī; in fact, I assumed there was (yet another) error in the Wiktionary entry before I checked my dictionary, and indeed there are numerous words starting with the prefix cō̆n-, some of which should be long, some short. Why is this? What causes cōnsīdō to to have a long vowel whereas conveniō has a short one?

My immediate guess is that the vowel is lengthened due to the following present tense long vowel and that this is retained throughout the paradigm, but this is mere guesswork. In other words, I believe that this is not something to do with obscure Old Latin or Proto-Italic, but rather that this is an example of phonetic rules (that I do not fully understand) being at work. I would really appreciate an answer that can explain why this quantity change is at work and which rules (if any) govern this change.

  • Conveni for “I fit” is probably stretching things for parallelism, but some construction with convenire probably works. Commented Feb 23, 2022 at 18:48
  • Agreed. I would say it counts, agreeing with you.
    – Canned Man
    Commented Feb 23, 2022 at 23:28
  • 1
    @Kingshorsey It works in Russian for what it's worth, but the meaning isn't exactly "to occupy the space snugly" centered on the object, but "to be deemed fit" centered on the person who passes the judgement, as in "to suit". I think it's the same in Latin; I can only think of quadrāre. Commented Feb 24, 2022 at 2:27

1 Answer 1


We can consider the underlying length of the vowel in con- to be short: this is the default.

In cōnsēdī, and in the majority of cases where the vowel in the prefix cō̆(n)- is long, it is a result of the regular lengthening of any vowel before ns or nf. The same lengthening causes in-s..., in-f... to be realized as īns-, īnf-.

Aside from that, I only know of one other, much less common context where the prefix cō- shows up with a long vowel: some words where the unprefixed form starts with the letter n, such as cōnectō, cōnītor. Some words with n instead take the form cog-, as in cognōscō, cognātus. Forms with con-n- are apparently a more recent alternative to cō-n.

  • I take it then that v is governed by the same rule as f and that /z/ would cause the same lengthening, were it a phoneme in Latin?
    – Canned Man
    Commented Feb 23, 2022 at 23:29
  • 3
    @CannedMan: Lengthening of the vowel is not attested as far as I know before v: its original pronunciation was as a semivowel [w], and that is thought to have still been the general value during the "Classical Latin" period (1st century BC) and possibly persisted up through the 5th century AD (see previous question on dating of the change from w).
    – Asteroides
    Commented Feb 24, 2022 at 0:05
  • 3
    @CannedMan V /w/ is a liquid and patterns with /j, l, r/, not with fricatives, so there was probably optional assimilation into /ww/ but no lengthening. /z/ is a Greek "phonostyleme", but this is either always double or an affricate, so /zz/ or /dz/. After /n/ it was almost certainly the latter (/ndz/) and didn't lengthen the vowel. Commented Feb 24, 2022 at 2:11
  • @Asteroides: Yes, of course! (I speak with a Classical pronunciation myself, so I am not sure what I was thinking.) How about after the sound change? Did /v/ (not /w/) cause lengthening the same way /f/ did?
    – Canned Man
    Commented Feb 24, 2022 at 16:03

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.