Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with ecclesiastical-latin
Search options not deleted
user 13648
This tag is used for questions concerning the liturgical and codified language of the church from the end of antiquity until today.
3
votes
Accepted
Dominus vobiscum / omitted `esse' in subjunctive mood (sit)?
In Greek and Latin (and other languages) verbs of being (e.g. esse) are often omitted if they are not needed for the context.
Take Ephesians 1:2 as an example:
“χάρις ὑμῖν καὶ εἰρήνη” (Ephesians 1:2 …
- 392