Unus, -a, -um means number "1". What is the word for number "0"?
https://www.translate.com/english-latin says it is nulla. Is it correct?
Unus, -a, -um means number "1". What is the word for number "0"?
https://www.translate.com/english-latin says it is nulla. Is it correct?
Classical Latin does not have a word for, or a concept of, “zero”. Fibonacci in about 1200 used the term zephirum, a transcription of Arabic ṣifr “empty”, then “zero” as a calque on Sanskrit śūnya “empty, zero”.
Just an addendum, but you can translate "zero" as nullus, -a, -um when it's used in sentences like, "I have zero pigs." The Romans would say: nullos porcos habeo.
But in English, it's no different from saying, "I have no pigs."
https://www.translate.com/english-latin says it is nulla. Is it correct?
No, it isn't. Nulla is classical Latin for nothing. It's one thing that the Romans could've used instead of the number zero but it's not the actual number itself. Nihil and nihilum would be other go-tos.
In New Latin, the default is variants of cipher: cifra, cifera, ciphra, cyphra (in Euler), chifra, zifra, ziffra, zifera, ziphera, &c. There's also zephirum
1202, Leonardo Fibonacci, Liber Abaci, Cap. I:
Cum his itaque novem figuris, et cum hoc signo 0, quod arabice zephirum appellatur, scribitur quilibet numerus, […]
With these nine figures, and with this sign 0, which is called zero in Arabic, any number can be written, […]
and zerum if you want zero to show up in the dative and ablative.
The Latin word "nulla" is a good choice for translating the English word "zero". Here are some reasons:
That said, I think there are many other options for translating the English word "zero" into Latin. The word "nulla" is a common choice and it is attested in many ancient and modern documents.