Skip to main content
added 123 characters in body
Source Link
anon
anon

Relative pronouns (like quis/quis/quid doesn't) don't agree with its antecedent --their antecedents for case; instead, it agrees withgets that from its position in the subordinate clause. Note that they still agree in gender and number, since it's supposed to be a stand-in for the noun.

Because the pronoun stands in for "servi"a nominative use, the subject of the clause -- i.e. "servi"servi non parent" -- it has to be nominative plural, orwhich means it's "qui". Because "servos" is plural and masculine, the pronoun does as well.

You can find out more about relative pronouns here.

quis/quis/quid doesn't agree with its antecedent -- it agrees with its position in the subordinate clause.

Because the pronoun stands in for "servi" -- i.e. "servi non parent" -- it has to be nominative plural, or "qui".

Relative pronouns (like quis/quis/quid) don't agree with their antecedents for case; instead, it gets that from its position in the subordinate clause. Note that they still agree in gender and number, since it's supposed to be a stand-in for the noun.

Because the pronoun stands in for a nominative use, the subject of the clause -- i.e. "servi non parent" -- it has to be nominative, which means it's "qui". Because "servos" is plural and masculine, the pronoun does as well.

You can find out more about relative pronouns here.

Source Link
anon
anon

quis/quis/quid doesn't agree with its antecedent -- it agrees with its position in the subordinate clause.

Because the pronoun stands in for "servi" -- i.e. "servi non parent" -- it has to be nominative plural, or "qui".