Skip to main content
deleted 12 characters in body
Source Link
Kingshorsey
  • 7.4k
  • 16
  • 24

necesse is a predicate that, in this case, takes a subject clause. We tend to render these subject clauses in English either as a "that-clause" like indirect discourse [that the possessor is happy] or as a gerund phrase [the possessor being happy].

The subject is "qui potiatur sit beatus."

All of this is in a relative clause introduced by quo, which is correlative with id.

That thing alone would be good, by virtue of which (quo) it would beis inevitable (necesse sitest) that the one who should possess it would be happy (qui potiatur sit beatus).

Or:

That thing alone would be good, by virtue of which (quo) the one possessing it being happy (qui potiatur sit beatus) would beis inevitable (necesse sitest).

necesse is a predicate that, in this case, takes a subject clause. We tend to render these subject clauses in English either as a "that-clause" like indirect discourse [that the possessor is happy] or as a gerund phrase [the possessor being happy].

The subject is "qui potiatur sit beatus."

All of this is in a relative clause introduced by quo, which is correlative with id.

That thing alone would be good, by virtue of which (quo) it would be inevitable (necesse sit) that the one who should possess it would be happy (qui potiatur sit beatus).

Or:

That thing alone would be good, by virtue of which (quo) the one possessing it being happy (qui potiatur sit beatus) would be inevitable (necesse sit).

necesse is a predicate that, in this case, takes a subject clause. We tend to render these subject clauses in English either as a "that-clause" like indirect discourse [that the possessor is happy] or as a gerund phrase [the possessor being happy].

The subject is "qui potiatur sit beatus."

All of this is in a relative clause introduced by quo, which is correlative with id.

That thing alone would be good, by virtue of which (quo) it is inevitable (necesse est) that the one who should possess it would be happy (qui potiatur sit beatus).

Or:

That thing alone would be good, by virtue of which (quo) the one possessing it being happy (qui potiatur sit beatus) is inevitable (necesse est).

subjunctives
Source Link
Kingshorsey
  • 7.4k
  • 16
  • 24

necesse is a predicate that, in this case, takes a subject clause. We tend to render these subject clauses in English either as a "that-clause" like indirect discourse [that the possessor is happy] or as a gerund phrase [the possessor being happy].

The subject is "qui potiatur sit beatus."

All of this is in a relative clause introduced by quo, which is correlative with id.

That thing alone iswould be good, by virtue of which (quo) it iswould be inevitable (necesse estsit) that the one who possessesshould possess it iswould be happy (qui potiatur sit beatus).

Or:

That thing alone iswould be good, by virtue of which (quo) the one possessing it being happy (qui potiatur sit beatus) iswould be inevitable (necesse estsit).

necesse is a predicate that takes a subject clause. We tend to render these subject clauses in English either as a "that-clause" like indirect discourse [that the possessor is happy] or as a gerund phrase [the possessor being happy].

The subject is "qui potiatur sit beatus."

All of this is in a relative clause introduced by quo, which is correlative with id.

That thing alone is good, by virtue of which (quo) it is inevitable (necesse est) that the one who possesses it is happy (qui potiatur sit beatus).

Or:

That thing alone is good, by virtue of which (quo) the one possessing it being happy (qui potiatur sit beatus) is inevitable (necesse est).

necesse is a predicate that, in this case, takes a subject clause. We tend to render these subject clauses in English either as a "that-clause" like indirect discourse [that the possessor is happy] or as a gerund phrase [the possessor being happy].

The subject is "qui potiatur sit beatus."

All of this is in a relative clause introduced by quo, which is correlative with id.

That thing alone would be good, by virtue of which (quo) it would be inevitable (necesse sit) that the one who should possess it would be happy (qui potiatur sit beatus).

Or:

That thing alone would be good, by virtue of which (quo) the one possessing it being happy (qui potiatur sit beatus) would be inevitable (necesse sit).

Source Link
Kingshorsey
  • 7.4k
  • 16
  • 24

necesse is a predicate that takes a subject clause. We tend to render these subject clauses in English either as a "that-clause" like indirect discourse [that the possessor is happy] or as a gerund phrase [the possessor being happy].

The subject is "qui potiatur sit beatus."

All of this is in a relative clause introduced by quo, which is correlative with id.

That thing alone is good, by virtue of which (quo) it is inevitable (necesse est) that the one who possesses it is happy (qui potiatur sit beatus).

Or:

That thing alone is good, by virtue of which (quo) the one possessing it being happy (qui potiatur sit beatus) is inevitable (necesse est).