Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 13, 2020 at 14:37 answer added Rafael timeline score: 2
Aug 13, 2020 at 12:56 answer added tony timeline score: 1
Aug 11, 2020 at 20:55 answer added Mitomino timeline score: 4
Aug 11, 2020 at 13:04 answer added Joonas Ilmavirta timeline score: 2
Aug 7, 2020 at 14:31 comment added Joonas Ilmavirta @Rafael That Spanish requires its plus unlike Italian and French is good evidence that the omission is not global and thus might not trace back to Latin. (And that the whole thing could or should be seen as omission of plus/más/più.) I'm getting pretty convinced – and I'm glad to learn more about Spanish as I'm in the slow process of learning some basics.
Aug 7, 2020 at 14:13 comment added Rafael I guess (but it is no more than a far fetched guess) the omission of the word for more is a regional thing. In Spanish the "más" is needed: you can't say *no tengo que un amigo.
Aug 7, 2020 at 13:58 comment added Joonas Ilmavirta @Rafael I am looking for the closest Latin equivalent of the Romance thing. Perhaps there is indeed no exact match. I agree that Latin seems to require plus (as in your non plus quam unum amicum habeo or my non habeo plus quam unum amicum), but there might be options in Latin I had considered impossible. If there's an answer "you can't get closer than that" with upvotes, I'd be happy to consider the matter settled, as it's hard to prove impossibility. Any insight into the origins of the Romance construction would be fun, too, as it would shed light on the absence in Latin.
Aug 7, 2020 at 13:37 comment added Rafael Constructions like non plus ultra suggest me something like non plus quam amicum unum habeo. But it seems implied by your question that you are looking for somethinkg more concise, not that "regularly" grammatical, so to say?
Aug 7, 2020 at 11:24 history edited Joonas Ilmavirta CC BY-SA 4.0
added 135 characters in body
Aug 6, 2020 at 11:27 history asked Joonas Ilmavirta CC BY-SA 4.0