Timeline for Historicity doubted by Romans
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2021 at 5:54 | history | bounty ended | Joonas Ilmavirta♦ | ||
| Apr 13, 2021 at 20:44 | comment | added | Joonas Ilmavirta♦ | This answer has been elected one of the best answers of 2019. | |
| S Dec 25, 2020 at 14:22 | history | suggested | Tsundoku | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Traslated -> Translated; other minor edits.
|
| Dec 23, 2020 at 22:24 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 25, 2020 at 14:22 | |||||
| Aug 19, 2019 at 10:07 | vote | accept | Joonas Ilmavirta♦ | ||
| Jul 24, 2019 at 22:15 | comment | added | cnread | I was hoping someone would bring up Valerius Antias. In grad school, I took a seminar on the Roman annalists, and my project for the term was all about V.A. Since then, I've always had a bit of a soft spot for him. +1 | |
| Jul 24, 2019 at 18:22 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jul 24, 2019 at 18:51 | |||||
| Jul 24, 2019 at 16:04 | comment | added | Joonas Ilmavirta♦ | Many thanks! We do in fact have a question on "fake news" in Latin, and that finding of yours would fit there nicely. | |
| Jul 24, 2019 at 15:54 | history | edited | Dario | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jul 24, 2019 at 15:48 | history | answered | Dario | CC BY-SA 4.0 |