Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with romance-languages
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 78
For questions related to the process of vulgar/medieval Latin becoming modern Romance languages
6
votes
Accepted
Is the word "pitikkus" (meaning small) attested in Vulgar (or other) Latin?
I don't see why Latin, even vulgar Latin, would adopt a double-k, but that's actually beside the point.
The entry in Wiktionary has an asterisk before the word: *pitikkus. This mark means that the wor …
cmw♦
- 58.2k