Vulgus "crowd, mob, common people" is a neuter second-declension noun. But unlike most second-declension neuters, it ends in -us, like a masculine.

How did this happen? Is there an etymological reason why vulgus got an -us ending while so many other neuters got -um?


1 Answer 1


There surely is an etymological reason, but unfortunately we don’t know it. Or there is no consensus about it.

All grammars mention the three second-declension neuters in -us, pelagus, virus and vulgus, and many go on explaining that pelagus is a recent Greek loanword which retained its gender (possibly influenced by mare), while virus has Indo-european cognates clarifying its history, and... what is said of vulgus is, at best, that both a regular masculine and a regular neuter exist alongside the irregular neuter in -us. They could be recent analogical forms, but somebody thinks that they are ancient and the irregular form was somehow conflated from them. Vulgus has known Indo-european cognates (Sanskrit varga, “group”), but they don’t explain its irregularity in an unambiguous way. At least, not in any sources I’ve consulted.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.