Is "urgeo inurgor" a correct Latin phrase, meaning "to squeeze the unsqeezable"?

Question

As a tongue-in-cheek joke, I'm trying to make a motto out of Russian phrase "впихнуть невпихуемое", which is literally translated as "to squeeze unsqueezable". 'Squeeze' being used in this context as 'to forcibly fit something into a tight place'.

This is a more informal version of "put a camel through the eye of a needle", basically.

I don't know a slightest bit of Latin, so tried my best with Wikipedia and came up with this:

urgeo inurgor

Rationale:

• urgeo is something which comes in Google Translate for 'push'/'press'
• in as a negative prefix
• taken the stem urg- for the second word
• -or suffix — one of verb-to-noun suffixes I found in the Wiki list

So, question is: Is this an accurate representation of the above ('to squeeze the unsqueezable')? Or is there a better way to squeeze the meaning in?

Answer 1

Urgueo/urgeo does mean "push/press," but it's more in the sense of trying to push forward rather than into something: militarily, rivers against a shore, age against a person as time passes. I don't think it's the right word.

I'm going to offer

Magna per lacunas ponenda parvas.

as a motto. A literal translation would be something like, "Large things must be put through small gaps." Latin has a pretty free word order, and putting magna ("large") first and parvas ("small") last creates a nice balance that's characteristic of mottos and aphorisms.

Answer 2

Ok, four years later, at cmw's and Joonas' request, I propose,

instrinxibilia interstringere

Note that the first word isn't actually attested, but sounds like a natural construction of in– + strinxi + –bilis for unsqueezable. Here, the verb stringo means to draw tight, to bind or tie tight; to draw, bind, or press together. From that, instrinxibilia is a regular plural neuter, to mean the unsqueezable or just unsqueezable things.

The verb interstringo, -ere, in turn, is attested and means to squeeze tight.