3

The genre of "opera" (as in, a particular type of theatre involving a lot of singing) post-dates the Roman Empire, and the English word for it transparently comes from the plural of opus. In most European languages the word has the same origin.

So if I wanted to talk about opera in Latin, what word should I use? Opera -ae is the obvious choice, but that seems ambiguous given how common the word opus is.

  • Latin already had opera, -ae, which, unlike opus, meant strictly willfully performed work; the distinction has been lost in the modern musical parlance. It's a more plausible immediate etymology for “opera” than the plural of opus, although L. opera ultimately ascends to it. – kkm Jul 8 '18 at 8:28
1

It depends on whom you are talking to. Both opera f. sg. and opus in the musical sense are obviously transparent to anyone born after 1700, and I'd go with it in a modern text.

If you are explaining opera to a Roman, though, consider how much music and singing the classical theater involved already. To them, the opera would certainly be a kind of drama, so your best bet would be to emphasize the properties that distinguish it from the “default,” central definition of the concept. I can think of two major ones: music as a significant feature, and the singing. Both were already prominent in the classical theater (I am reminded of the Tacitus' account of Nero playing lyre and singing; it made me chuckle), so it perhaps should not take a massive verbiage to amplify one or both.

For the emphasis on music, Joonas' melicum sounds good to me. I cannot, however, think of a single classical word that would oppose singing to reciting, e. g. carmen is both a song and a poem, and cano is both sing and recite; it seems to me that these concepts were not separate in the Roman mind. Cic. and later Plin. used cum symphonia canere to describe singing.

The most concise way to convey both emphases that I can think of is the adj./p.p. modulatum, which, in general, implies adding rhythm to an artistic performance, thus drama modulatum for “opera”. (Note that modulatum has a side effect that it also might imply dancing, which was also present in the dramatic κατάβασις, but this would not probably disqualify it.) All things considered, I imagine that a concise introduction to the concept of modern opera along the lines of drama musicā symphoniaque modulatum quid nostri operam vocat would paint a close enough picture to a Roman of the classical times.

|improve this answer|||||
1

Vicipaedia — which is not the highest authority on Latin but a decent source of ideas — gives four Latin translations: Melodrama, opera, drama musicum, and drama melicum.

If one wants to be able to make a distinction between opera, melodrama, musical drama, and other possible concepts, it is safest to pick a word close enough to the Italian original. Choosing translations is a matter of preference. I give more weight to clear communication than adhering to classical style. I would find it confusing to use a completely different term in Latin, when other European languages use more or less the same word. Therefore my suggestion is to use the first declension feminine opera as in Italian. If that feels insufficiently Latinate, the next one on my list is opus.

|improve this answer|||||

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.