7

I was recently taking a sort of multiple choice quiz on just general Latin knowledge, and I came upon one question that threw me for a loop, so to speak. The question asked which of the options best described the differences between the question words -ne, nonne, and num. Using process of elimination, I found that there was only one answer where nonne was expecting an affirmative answer and num was expecting a negative answer. The problem was, however, that -ne was labelled as being used to express fear in the question. I have never really thought of using -ne in this way, and a quick lookup of the enclitic in Lewis and Short reveals just what I thought: that -ne was used for a question expecting a yes or no answer, or for emphasis. The word ne (negative of ut) can be used for fear clauses, but the question specifically had the enclitic form -ne. -ne is also used to add emphasis to a question, so one can see how this could be translated to fear in some way, but this seems rather a broad stroke to paint if one is trying to point out the distinctions between each of the words.

Therefore, my question is: can the enclitic -ne add specific connotations of fear to a question, and if so, are there examples of this in classical literature?

  • Are you sure it wasn't referring to cases like timeo ne + subj.? – brianpck May 30 '18 at 20:34
  • @brianpck Like I said in the question, it specifically asked about -ne in reference to questions. It would be rather odd if they actually meant ne in reference to questions. – Sam K May 30 '18 at 20:36
  • 1
    It sounds to me like the maker of this "quiz" misread a grammar book or just doesn't know what he's talking about. But I'd be happy to be proven wrong! – brianpck May 30 '18 at 20:45
5

The quiz seems to be wrong. The triplet nonne, num, -ne is indeed important for Latin questions, and therefore naturally studied together. It seems that at some point the author of the quiz mistook -ne for ne — perhaps they looked at the wrong dictionary entry by accident. And even for ne it is a case of overinterpretation; the conjunction has many uses and is used also for many subordinate clauses expressing fear, but the word itself does not imply fear. I would say that ne has a connection to fear, -ne does not, but neither expresses fear in itself.

I have never seen -ne expressing fear not seen any grammar or dictionary mention it. If I wanted to make a fearful question, I would specifically use one of the other two words mentioned: Num leo me edet? Nonne pater revertatur? Using -ne makes the question neutral, whereas in case of fear one type of answer is expected or hoped.

It is possible that there are ways to use -ne to indicate fear. Even if such examples are found, that is very rare and makes a silly question for a quiz. The main role of -ne in questions as opposed to those of nonne and num is quite clear and has nothing to do with fear.

  • And, even though ne is used in clauses of fearing, the conjunction itself does not indicate fear at all. – Anonym May 30 '18 at 22:55
  • @Anonym Indeed. I had not worded that quite clearly, so I added some emphasis to it. – Joonas Ilmavirta May 30 '18 at 23:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.