- Russian and polish wikipedia say the classical term was memoria damnata, or abolitio memoriae, without, however giving a direct source. Goettingen's Institute of Archealogy uses memoria damnata in a short article on the concept
- Adrastos Omissi, Emperors and Usurpers in the Later Roman Empire: Civil War, Panegyric, and the Construction of Legitimacy, Oxford University Press, 28 june 2018, page 36, ISBN 978-0-19-255827-5 says
On near-equivalent terms used by Roman writers, see F. Vittinghoff,
Der Staatsfeind in der römischen Kaiserzeit: Untersuchungen zur
'damnatio memoriae', Neue deutsche Forschungen, Abteilung alte
Geschichte 2, Berlin, Junker und Dünnhaupt, 1936, pages 64-74
- This monography Der Staatsfeind in der römischen Kaiserzeit: Untersuchungen zur 'damnatio memoriae' exists. Unfortunately, I couldn't find an available copy
- Yet, the Martelage et damnatio memoriae : une introduction, Stéphane Benoist, Cahiers du Centre Gustave Glotz, Année 2003, 14, pp. 231-240, mentions, and quotes! the german monography:

"oder genauer der memoria damnata" - "or, more precisely, the memoria damnata"
Note, at this point, the relevant comment:
Please note that Vittinghoff rejects "memoria damnata" just like "damnatio memoriae" as erroneus and says Roman historians either talked about individual sanctions or talked about the decision to condemn the name or image in general. –
Sebastian Koppehel
Apr 17 at 18:34
- In Mutilation and Transformation, damnatio memoriae and roman imperial portraiture, Eric R. Varner, 2004, Brill, page 2, one can read
When discussing the condamnation of a person's memory and monuments,
ancient authors usually combine the word memoria with particulary
strong verbs damnare, condemnare, accusare, abolere, or eradere
with the following footnote:

Memoria damnata seems to be recurrent.