16

I stumbled across this question on the pronunciation of 'vacuum' in the “linguistics” forum.

My question is: If uacuus is *wak+wo- why does uacuus have three syllables, but uiuus, paruus, caluus etc. have only two? Is there a rule that says that *wu remains after sonants (including l, r) but becomes *uu otherwise?

Improve this question
1
  • 1
    "Equus" might be an interesting one to compare against. – Draconis♦ Apr 8 '17 at 14:47
11
+50

The adjective uacuus is formed from the verb uacō (“I am empty, void”) with the help of the ‎adjective-forming suffix -uus. This suffix has 2 variants, the 1-syllable one and the 2-syllable one.

The 1-syllable form -vus is used after vowels (flā-vus, vī-vus), after L (cal-vus), and R (par-vus, cor-vus), and the 2-syllable form of that suffix, -uus is used after all other other consonants, like in your word vac-uus, with the exception of QU. In this last case, the form -us is used (multiloqu-us, obliqu-us).

Improve this answer
2
  • 7
    Some more examples (from Weiss 297-8) supporting this pattern: salvus, clīvus, rāvus, rīvus, fulvus, furvus, helvus, arvus vs. caeduus, continuus, dīviduus, exiguus, irriguus, pāscuus, praecipuus. – TKR Apr 8 '17 at 16:38
  • 4
    @AlexB. I think Yellow Sky is using the "v" and "u" to differentiate between the one syllable and two syllable forms. The Romans would not have differentiated the symbols, but we, in the modern day, do so that is what he is getting at (1 syllable following vowels and liquids, 2 syllables after consonants). – Sam K Apr 9 '17 at 1:44
4

Yes, this is a well-known rule (see Leumann 1977: 132-133, Tronskii 1960: 101, Weiss 2009/2011: 124 and many others).

Weiss puts it this way,

“An unstressed short vowel between a liquid and u̯ is syncopated” (p. 124):

*bholh1i-u̯os > *foliu̯os > fulvus

*sl̩h₂u̯os (or *sl̩h₂euos) > *salau̯os > salvus

*arau̯om > arvum

cf. Leumann "Postkons. lat. u̯ (v) vor Vokal aus vokal. u: vorhistorisch hinter r l; hinter anderen Konsonanten aus Versnot bei Daktylikern, spaeter allgemein im Vulgaerlatein" (p. 132).

It occurred in the pre-literary period.

Exception:

“If the vowel in the preceding syllable was long, the syncope did not occur until the post-Plautine period:

mīluus > mīlvus

lārua > lārva

*pēleu̯is > pēluis > pēlvis

Improve this answer
15
  • I don’t see any evidence for *sala-wus, with or without syncopation. The cognates (e.g. Skt sarva-, Gk. *holwos > holos) point to *salw-us. – fdb Apr 9 '17 at 17:57
  • @fdb in Latin -lu̯- develops to -ll- (hence, sollus). But salvus is usually explained with syncope (thus,-lu̯- remains). See Leumann para 60 or Weiss (p. 162, point 9). NB: Unable to fix formatting/italics/reconstructed forms. – Alex B. Apr 9 '17 at 18:19
  • @fdb I assume you've looked it up in Beekes or de Vaan? Because they do address the point you raised. (Beekes: *slh2-eu-) – Alex B. Apr 9 '17 at 22:22
  • de Vaan actually writes *slH-u- with unidentified laryngeal. The laryngeal is posited to explain the /a/ in the first syllable. – fdb Apr 9 '17 at 22:32
  • 1
    Ah, that's the sound change I was missing! That makes sense, thanks. – TKR Apr 13 '17 at 21:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.