I learned from TKR's answer to this question about neuter endings that the neuter pronoun hoc is pronounced like hocc, causing it to be scanned long despite having a short vowel. I had never heard of this before, but I want to understand better. This leads me to some questions:

  • Can you provide a couple of examples of nominative or accusative hoc followed by a vowel and scanned long?
  • Are there examples in classical poetry that treat hoc normally, scanning it short before a vowel?
  • Are there other words that unexpectedly scan long always or often? I suspect the suffix -ce might lead to this effect. This question includes other forms of the same pronoun, especially the masculine hic.
  • 3
    I found a relevant passage in Bennett (1907) that I summarize in my answer to What effect should a macron have on the sound of a letter and its word?. He thinks it is likely that a long final consonant occured in some nominative forms where original -s was assimilated to a preceding s, l, or r, as in far, farris. I'm unsure about the extent to which this is supported by metrical evidence. – Asteroides Feb 2 '17 at 10:08
  • 2
    Lewis does give "fār", which suggests to me there's at least some evidence that this word scans long before a vowel. (I don't know if the macron is supposed to indicate vowel length--which seems at least possible, if it were the result of compensatory lengthening--or if it's a misleading way of indicating a long "r" as Bennett suggests). – Asteroides Feb 2 '17 at 10:10
  • @sumelic Interesting! It could be that dictionaries mark some vowels length due to metric evidence but the authors have misinterpreted a long consonant for a long vowel. A short study of words of this kind would constitute a nice answer. – Joonas Ilmavirta Feb 2 '17 at 10:12
  • Is far long from Synizesis? – Hugh Feb 3 '17 at 14:53
  • @Hugh I don't know about far. That's a potential answer word. By hic I mean the one with short vowel, hence the word "masculine". – Joonas Ilmavirta Feb 3 '17 at 15:08

Hoc is always scanned long in classical poetry, because it is the same as *hocc (from *hocce < *hodce). I give only a couple of examples, but you can check by yourself using http://www.pedecerto.eu/ricerca/forma. It is the same for the other words formed with the intensifying particle -ce, like istuc (from *istucce < *istudce) or illuc (from *illucce < *illudce)

Lucil. sat. 1032: hoc etiam accipe quod dico: nam pertinet ad rem

Verg. ecl. 1,539: Quod genus hoc hominum? quaeue hunc tam barbara morem

Concerning other words which present the same gemination phenomenon, there are:

  • words from -rr, like cor (from *cord), which is scanned long by archaic authors only (e.g. Plaut. Pers. 802 [quaternary cataleptic anapest] cor uritur, caput ne ardescat, but already in Lucil. sat. 516 is scanned short: vera putant, credunt signis cor inesse in aenis), or ter (from *terr, cfr. the compound terruncius);

  • words from -ss (from the assimilation of the dental conosonant of the stem and the -s of the first person nominative singular desinence), like miles, compos, dives, eques, hospes, impos et similia, or in es (second person singular of sum, from *ess), cfr. e.g. Plaut. Aul. 528 (iambic senarius): miles impransus astat, aes censet dari; Plaut. Cas. 817 (iambic senarius): sospes iter incipe hoc, uti viro tuo; but already in Ennius these syllables are scanned short (e.g. ann. 269: spernitur orator bonus, horridus miles amatur).

Vd. M. Leumann, Lateinische Laut- und Formenlehre, München 1977, pp. 220-221; S. Boldrini, La prosodia e la metrica dei Romani, Roma 1992, pp. 50-51.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.