3

How to understand a meaning of the infinitive 'habere' here, is it here as a subject (The Infinitive as a Subject, Gildersleeve & Lodge, page 275)?

Nam cum posse existere potentia sit, sequitur quo plus realitatis alicujus rei naturæ competit eo plus virium a se habere ut existat adeoque Ens absolute infinitum sive Deum infinitam absolute potentiam existendi a se habere, qui propterea absolute existit. (Spinoza, Ethics)<

For, as the potentiality of existence is a power, it follows that, in proportion as reality increases in the nature of a thing, so also will it increase its strength for existence. Therefore a being absolutely infinite, such as God, has from himself an absolutely infinite power of existence, and hence he does absolutely exist. (R.H.M.Elwes)

eo plus virium a se habere ut existat <

..., more strength from itself (it would) possess in order to exist,...

5

Accusativum cum infinitivo triggered by sequitur, though the accusative has been ellipsed: 'it follows that it has...'

This use falls under definition 7 of sequor in the Oxford Latin Dictionary:

7 To follow from (a premiss), follow logically.

Attestations:

(w. acc. and inf.) nec si omne enuntiatum aut uerum aut falsum est, ~quitur ilico esse causas immutabilis .. quae .. Cic. Fat. 28; Lucr. 3.665.

  • But how does 'competit',then fits in, why not 'competere' in it's place? @cnread – Aili J. Dec 28 '16 at 21:47
  • 1
    @aili-j It's not infinitive because quo...competit is a subordinate clause within the ACI construction, triggered by eo. Main idea: 'it follows that it has from itself more strength for existing to that degree'; subordinate ([cor]relative) clause: '(to the degree) that more reality belongs to the nature of some thing.' – cnread Dec 28 '16 at 23:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.