5

I'm a programmer and I'm thinking of creating a bot to carry out tedious tasks on my behalf. My name is Patrick. Would patrick-conscriptus be a reasonable pun for its name, "the Patrick who was written together", since in English one idiomatically "writes" software and it is literally assembled from writing?

Research: I checked Perseus to make sure I'd correctly singularised "patres conscripti", so I am at least confident the grammar is right, but Perseus only mentions "enrolled" rather than the more general sense of "written together" I'm hoping it carries.

I suspect it is in fact a reasonable pun, but I've seen so many nonsense attempts at Latin over the years (which I always think reflects badly on their originators for not checking) that I don't really trust myself.

1 Answer 1

5

Yes, Patrick conscriptus is correct, and your expression can indeed be read as, “the Patrick who was written/drawn up/composed.” And if your goal is a pun on patres conscripti (singular: pater conscriptus), then that's probably the best you can do. Usually I would at this point advocate for using the original Latin form of the name, Patricius, but in this particular case I admit it might ruin the wordplay.

However, “written” is not the most natural reading. If you talk about an actual written work – say, a liber, epistula, tabella or testamentum – then the verb conscribere is obviously most naturally understood in the sense of writing. But when talking about human beings, a more specialized sense prevails, as you have seen: It means to write somebody's name on a list; especially enrolling someone in the military (cf. the English term “conscript”), but also for other purposes. You can compare this to the English verb “write up.” If a report is written up, it's actually written. If a motorist is written up, he probably violated some traffic law.

Note that the term patres conscripti for the members of the Roman Senate is an example of this, although it's not clear who is on what kind of list there, and even in classical times people were already confused about the exact meaning of this traditional moniker. Many modern reference works agree that the patres and the conscripti were originally two classes of members, i.e., it should be thought of as patres et conscripti, but by the classical era, there was certainly no such distinction.

Given that you want to write a pun about an unusual situation – a person that was actually written – I think you can ignore the more natural reading, though.

1
  • 2
    If he's Patricius conscriptus, he can go around mocking the plebs.
    – cmw
    Commented Oct 2, 2023 at 18:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.