To my understanding, Latin doesn't have a dual number at all. The adjectives duo "two" and ambō "both" have some special forms derived from the PIE dual (-ō, -ābus, -ōbus), but are considered irregular rather than part of any real pattern.

However, from an answer to an unrelated question:

By the way, another heterogeneous noun with a similar story behind it is frēnum "rein", pl. frēnī. In this case the Latin masculine plural ending continues what was in PIE terms not a plural at all, but a neuter dual.

This points to another trace of the dual number which I hadn't heard about before.

Are there any other irregularities or fossilized forms in Latin which derive from the dual number in PIE or Proto-Italic?


The -ī of vīgintī "20" is originally a dual ending, the same one as in frēnī (PIE *-ih₁). This is why the ending of vīgintī is different from that of the other tens (trīgintā etc.)

| improve this answer | |

According to W.M. Lindsay The Latin Language: An Historical Account of Latin Sounds, Stems, and Flexions (p. 253), octo could also be a dual in form, with the sense of 'two sets of four'. He sees a comparison with ambo and duo because of the ending ō-sound.

I don't get why it would mean 'two sets of four' though.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    If the ō-sound is enough, then Cicero must mean "two chickpeas". I hope the sound and eight being an even number were not his only reasons to propose this. – Joonas Ilmavirta Dec 6 '16 at 21:57
  • 7
    @JoonasIlmavirta. IE *oḱtō is the dual of a noun the singular of which survives as Avestan ašti- “span, four-fingers length”, as was pointed out by W.B. Henning, Transactions of the Philological Society 1948, p. 69. (Yes, this brilliant article is exactly one page long). – fdb Dec 6 '16 at 23:16

It looks like a couple of neuter nouns of the fourth declension might have nominative singular forms derived from PIE duals. (Note that the nominative neuter ending -u might have been pronounced either as or -ū; it seems that we don't have any clear evidence either way for the quality of the vowel in this context.) A form with a long vowel could be explained as deriving from PIE dual *-uh₁; the dual form is mentioned as a possible source of a Latin form in De Vaan's entries for genu "knee" ("PIE *ǵen-u(-h₁ dual), *ǵen-u- (obl.)") and cornu "horn" ("If ū is original, cornu may reflect the nom.acc.dual ending *-uh₁; especially for cornū *'pair of horns' > 'horn'").

| improve this answer | |
  • This is interesting. I never realised how two of the most common -u nouns normally grow in pairs! And I've always found the -u ending odd (although I might have thought of a dropped -d à la illud, istud). – Cerberus May 5 '19 at 22:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.