Why is the i in inest short, while the i in īnsunt is long?

As far as I know (see for example https://glosbe.com/la/en/insum, or LLPSI), the conjugation of this verb in the present tense goes like this:

  • īnsum
  • ines
  • inest
  • īnsumus
  • inestis
  • īnsunt

What's up with this changing vowel length? I mean, I accept that it just is this way, but is there some etymological or phonological explanation for this pattern?


1 Answer 1


The vowel is originally short, as in the preposition and most instances of the prefix. Any vowel before NS or NF becomes long, and this causes the S-initial forms of esse to lengthen the vowel of the prefix. You can observe the same pattern in the prefix in- before words starting with S or F, but it's certainly most striking with esse which varies its initial letter.

One can argue that the vowel being marked long is merely a typographical convention. Namely, in typical classical pronunciation a syllable ending in an N before an S has its vowel lengthened and nasalized and the consonant is lost. Not all conventions in all times and places do this, so the macron may or may not make a difference depending on how you pronounce Latin. A nasal disappearing and leaving the preceding vowel nasalized and long is not uncommon, but the exact scope of this phenomenon is beyond the scope of this question. The practical answer is that the vowel quantities are as you found them to be due to the simple rule given in my first paragraph.

  • In your second paragraph you mean any syllable ending in N before S or F, right? There is some evidence of the N being restored in educated speech in at least some words in Classical times (so that e.g. consul becomes /ˈkoːn.sul/, still with a long O but also with N), but AFAIK that's all just Roman-quality "grammarians" reporting long after the fact and the vowel would be long either way.
    – Cairnarvon
    Commented Oct 2, 2022 at 15:11
  • @Cairnarvon I updated the answer a bit. I'm trying not to go into details, as they seem to be beyond the scope of this question, so the second paragraph is intended to be a vague pointer more than a hard fact. There's certainly room for a follow-up question or two.
    – Joonas Ilmavirta
    Commented Oct 2, 2022 at 18:39
  • 2
    I definitely think that part of what makes this such a good answer is that it doesn't go into great detail, especially about corner cases and exceptions.
    – Ben Kovitz
    Commented Oct 2, 2022 at 19:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.