6

I came across a poem from 1621 written in Sapphic stanza. It contains this line:

pervigil Christi, lucubrando sudans

To scan that, the third word must be lŭcŭbrandŏ. L&S tells me that the first U should always be long and the second one can be either long or short. The O of the gerund ablative ending should be long.

Classic vowel length is otherwise observed very well throughout the nine stanzas of the poem. This line is a striking exception.

I know that if the second U is short, then the second syllable is short (light), since the combination 'br' does not behave like most consonant clusters. But that is irrelevant.

I want to understand what is going on. Therefore I would like to see an answer to at least some of these questions:

  • Would such shortened vowels be bad style in classical poetry? I would say yes, but I could use a second opinion.
  • Is such shortening a general post-classical phenomenon? Or should I see this line just as poetic liberty to accommodate a word the author wanted to use?
  • Is the final O in the gerund ablative still known to be long in the 17th century? As far as I know, everyday Latin speech at that time did not follow classical vowel lengths, but the rest of this poem demonstrates that people were able to emulate them when needed. In two other places in the poem where length matters, the second declension ablative or dative ending is long. I therefore wonder if the short O is something specific to gerunds.
  • Why are the vowels short?
  • This is just a side note, but I would guess the transcription with a macron on the second syllable reflects a pronunciation where the syllable was closed by the "b" (i.e. /luːcub.randoː/) rather than a variant with a true "long by nature" vowel /uː/. What I've read is that clusters of mute + r generally could be syllabified either way in poetry, depending on the needs of the meter. – sumelic Oct 25 '16 at 5:24
  • 2
    @sumelic. In L/S (and all good dictionaries) macron and breve indicate vowel quantity, not syllable length. – fdb Oct 26 '16 at 9:41
  • @fdb: That may be true in general, but I don't know if L/S are always reliable for vowel quantity in closed syllables; they give a long vowel in major even though Allen says the "a" was short. – sumelic Oct 26 '16 at 15:37
5

I don't know any reason why the first vowel of "lucubrando" would be short; I'd guess it might be an error.

However, I was able to find some references that describe final o as often being treated as "common" (able to be long or short) for various words in various eras of poetry, and in particular in gerund.

In Adam's Latin Grammar, by Alexander Adam, from 1827, we find the following passage:

O final is common; as, Virgo, Amo, quando. [...] The gerund in DO in Virgil is long; in other poets it is short. (180)

So this at least mentions the phenomenon; I don't know how accurate this description is for Classical usage, however.

Another description from around 1898, in A Latin Grammar for Schools and Colleges by George Martin Lane, makes it seem less common:

Final o is short [in various listed words] and in many other words in late poetry : as īlico, immo, ergo, quando, octo, &c. ; very rarely in the ablative of the gerund. (447)

A book by Neil Wright about the Medieval Latin poem Gesta Regum Britannie says that in it "the ablative singular of the gerund is usually short"; obviously this is from not the classical period (it comes from the mid-1200s) but it may be a useful concrete example of another work with this feature.

  • 1
    It is interesting to hear that there is indeed something special about the gerund. Did Adam have examples of classical poets where the gerund ablative is short? I just went through Metamorphoses and there were only long ones. Perhaps it is a post-classical thing. – Joonas Ilmavirta Oct 25 '16 at 7:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.