3

When I learn a new word in Latin, should I learn it in a form:

  1. excluding diacritic (pax - peace)

or:

  1. including diacritic (pāx - peace)

? (question number one)

I have never seen the diacritic anywhere in a classic text nor on inscriptions below statues in architecture. Do they appear only in dictionaries? (question number two)

? Thank you.

1 Answer 1

3

The "Classical" orthography you'll find in manuscripts and such is slightly defective: there are some distinctions that are important to the language but aren't represented in writing. For example, actual Ancient Romans would have pronounced the difference between ālium "garlic" and alium "another", but generally wrote both as simply ALIVM. (Similarly, voluit "she wanted" and volvit "it rotates" would both be written VOLVIT.)

Modern dictionaries have modified the orthography slightly to indicate these distinctions. Along with introducing lowercase letters and the letters u and j, they'll often indicate vowel length by putting a line ("macron") over the long vowels. These are useful to learn, because they're needed to distinguish various words, and are also vitally important in Classical forms of poetry.

Whether modern editions of texts include these markings or not is generally up to the editor; some include them, some don't. But ancient inscriptions do actually have a way of indicating vowel length. Look at this example from the first century, and how it spells māter at the end of the fourth line, for instance. These marks ("apices") weren't used in all inscriptions, but were far from unheard of.

picture of an inscription with apices

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.