6

In Matthew 27, why does the Vulgate call the graves of people who were resurrected along with Jesus "monumentum", but Jesus's grave "sepulchrum"?

Matthew 27:53 says, in Vulgate:

Et exeuntes de monumentis post resurrectionem ejus, venerunt in sanctam civitatem, et apparuerunt multis.

In the New International Version:

They came out of the tombs after Jesus’ resurrection and went into the holy city and appeared to many people.

However, Matthew 27:61 says, in Vulgate:

Erant autem ibi Maria Magdalene, et altera Maria, sedentes contra sepulchrum.

In the New International Version:

Mary Magdalene and the other Mary were sitting there opposite the tomb.

So, was there some difference between monumentum and sepulchrum?

Improve this question
2
  • Just to confuse things, the French and Spanish translations use "sépulcres" and "sepulcros" for Matthew 27:53.
    – Ray Butterworth
    Commented Jun 25, 2023 at 0:46
  • @RayButterworth I suppose the translators to French and Spanish were translating a lot less literally than Jerome was.
    – FlatAssembler
    Commented Jun 25, 2023 at 15:05

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
10

The two words in the Vulgate are very literal translations of the words in the Greek original, which has ἐκ τῶν μνημείων [ek tōn mnēmeiōn] in 27:53 and ἀπέναντι τοῦ τάφου [apenanti tou tafou] in 27:61. Since μνημεῖον [mnēmeion] is etymologically related to μνήμη [mnēmē, "memory"], it is translated monumentum ["tomb, memorial", from moneo], whereas τάφος [tafos] is etymologically related to θάπτω [thaptō, "to bury"] and is translated sepulchrum ["tomb, burial place", from sepelio].

Improve this answer
6
  • 3
    Is there a difference in meaning?
    – Ben Kovitz
    Commented Apr 29, 2021 at 10:07
  • Sorry, I do not understand your answer, as I do not speak a word of Greek, and I am not even sure about the alphabet.
    – FlatAssembler
    Commented Apr 29, 2021 at 10:08
  • 2
    I've added transliterations and further explanations of the words.
    – gmvh
    Commented Apr 29, 2021 at 11:05
  • 4
    In the aorist, there are form of θάπτω that have the stemp ταφ-, so it ought to be a real etymology.
    – gmvh
    Commented Apr 29, 2021 at 12:05
  • 8
    @FlatAssembler That could honestly be a good question in its own right, but the short answer is, there's a rule in Ancient Greek called Grassmann's Law: if you have two H's too close to each other, the first one disappears. The underlying root here is thaph-, which appears as taph- before a vowel (first one disappears) but as thap- if it comes before a consonant that suppresses the second h (first one doesn't disappear). Compare also hekh- "have" which appears as ekh- before a vowel and hek- before a consonant.
    – Draconis ♦
    Commented Apr 29, 2021 at 14:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.