What was the decision regarding this Paris convent in 1561?

Question

This is the decision of the General Chapter of the Dominicans regarding some trouble in the Paris convent in 1561.

Fratres vero Antonium Abeli magistrum et Dominicum Sergent ut indignos denegamus, quorum priorem scilicet Abeli assignamus conventui Trecensi, et privamus cubiculo, quod tenet extra dormitorium propter causas dignas. Alterum vero declaramus non pertinere ad conventum Parisiensem, sed eum remittimus assignatum ad conventum suae professionis sine gradu.

Here is my attempted translation, with some queries. I am too uncertain about the Latin to understand the decision. Can anyone clarify the confusion? And where is Trecensi?

Indeed, the brothers Antoine Abeli and Dominic Sergent, that they are unworthy we deny (or we reject as unworthy?), of whom the first, namely Abeli, we assign to the convent of Trecensi (where?), and we deprive him of his room (or confine to his room?), because he kept outside the sleeping-area for reasons of dignity. The other indeed we declare not to belong to the Parisian convent, but we remit his appointment to the convent of his profession without position (or without delay?).

Answer 1

As always, more context would help, but I understand that may simply not be available.

My understanding is that the two dudes in question had been naughty in some way or another (...); an attempt at translation follows (with my reservations in square brackets):

However, the brothers A. Abeli, a teacher, and D. Sergent, we denounce [I think] as unworthy, the former of whom, i.e. Abeli, we assign to the monastery of Troyes et strip him of the bedroom which he holds outside the dormitory for valid reasons [whatever that means – maybe kinda like “obvious reasons”?]; the other however we declare does not belong to the Parisian monastery, but we send him back, with his crime pointed out [I think that's what “assignatum” means here], to the monastery of his profession [i.e., where he was first ordained], without rank.

Answer 2

Here is a translation of the add-on (which is rather interesting IMHO): “[B]ut since he had upset the Master of the Order Brother Vincentius Justiniani, the reason for which I do not find, unless perhaps that he strongly resisted to the attempt of the latter to separate the Parisian monastery from the French province and to place it under his own immediate rule [it does make you wonder who had actually been naughty here!]; however this may be, he was consequently thrown out during the conference [whatever the technical term is for such a meeting] of the order held at Avignon on 25 May 1561 and sent to the monastery at Troyes.” Interesting stuff! (BTW, questions like this one confirm the massive importance of Latin at a serious level for study of European history at large, and definitely for the sixteenth century.)

Answer 3

Acceptamus ("We accept") conventum nostrum Parisien et auctoritate ("with the authority of") sanctissimi domini nostri Pauli papae IIII subiicimus ("we bring it under the command of") illum (i.e. the monastery) immediate curae ... magistri ordinis ... et per omnia committimusque illi, ut ... restituat illum ad optimam formam tam in studiis quam regulari disciplina, in quibus defecisse videtur ("in which it appears to have failed"), ac proinde ex toto subtrahimus ("we take away") illum (i.e. the monastery) a cura et regimine reverendi vicarii congregationis Gallicanae, cui ex parte et nomine eiusdem sanctissimi domini nostri (i.e. Paul IV) in virtute sanctae obedientiae et sub poena absolutionis ab officio et excommunicationis latae sententiae (I suppose the worst punishment conceivable) praecipimus ("we order him"), ne de caetero se intromittat de illo conventu quantum ad dispositionem eius in temporalibus aut spiritualibus (i.e. he should stay out of it in regard), neve super et in eo ullam exerceat iurisdictionem (nor shall he have any jurisdiction over it)."