I notice that the genitive of unus can apparently be either the regular uni, or can also be unius.

Is this form, unius, just a completely irregular oddity, or is there some logical precedent for it? Are there other words that have this kind of genitive form?

  • Are you wondering about precedent within Latin itself, or something older (e.g. linking it back to a Proto-Indo-European form)? – Draconis Oct 25 at 4:23
  • 2
    "I notice that the genitive of unus can apparently be either the regular uni ..." ← this is news to me. Really? – Sebastian Koppehel Oct 25 at 13:05
  • 1
    Pretty much every pronoun has a genitive ending in -ius, which looks quite regular to me, despite the rather limited numer of words… – user149408 Oct 25 at 18:29
  • 1
    @SebastianKoppehel yes, it is very rare but the relevant OLD entry mentions at two occurrences of gen. sg. uni: Catul. 17.17 "ludere hanc sinit ut lubet, nec pili facit uni" and Titin. com. 7 "uni collegi sumus"(which stands for Titinius, 2nd century BC) - Priscian says the following: " uni pro unius Titinius in barbato: quod quidem pol mulier dicet, Namque uni collegi sumus" – Alex B. Oct 26 at 14:56
  • the relevant passage in Priscian stgallpriscian.ie/images/keil/Keil_v2_227.gif – Alex B. Oct 26 at 15:39

Many pronouns have this kind of genitive form

Genitives in -ius exist for a fairly small number of Latin words. I'm not sure of the exact amount. I would say that the stems that take this kind of genitive form constitute a "closed class", although there a\number of derived pronouns that inherit the inflection pattern of the base pronoun (e.g. quisque, cuiusque built on quis, cuius).

The usual pronunciation is with long -ī-, as -īus, although some forms in short -ǐus are also attested in poetry, and in eius, huius, and cuius the -i- is assumed to be a long consonant [j.j].

This genitive ending is characteristic to words declined with first/second declension endings that are used as pronouns or as quantifiers/determiners. In that sense, its usage is not arbitrary nor especially unpredictable. It could be considered irregular if you wish.

There are a few pronouns with complications in the genitive singular:

I haven't put together a complete list yet.


  • eius, huius, cuius
  • illīus, ipsīus, istīus

Derived from these pronouns:

  • eiusdem, cuiusdam, cuiuscumque, alicuius, cuiuspiam, cuiusvis

You can see some with quantifier/determininer uses listed in Allen and Greenough 113:

  1. The following nine adjectives with their compounds have the Genitive Singular in -īus and the Dative in -ī in all genders.
  • alius [aliud (n.)] other
  • tōtus whole
  • alter, -terīus the other
  • nūllus no, none
  • ūllus any
  • neuter, -trīus neither
  • sōlus alone
  • ūnus one
  • uter, -trīus which (of two)


b. The genitive in -īus, dative in -ī, and neuter in -d are pronominal in origin (cf. illīus, illī, illud, and § 146).

c. The i of the genitive ending -īus, though originally long, may be made short in verse; this occurs often in alterius and regularly in utriusque.

d. Instead of alīus, alterīus is commonly used, or in the possessive sense the adjective aliēnus, belonging to another, another's.

The etymology of Latin genitive singular forms is complicated

The etymological origins of this genitive singular ending, as well as the regular -ī genitive singular ending of the Latin second declension, are not straightforward and so appear to have been extensively discussed in linguistic literature. The only paper I have read so far (and only partially digested) is "The o-stem genitive singular: Considerations from the perspective of the Latin dialects", by Luca Rigobianco (2017, Études de linguistique latine II).

Rigobianco rejects a common hypothesis that derives cuius, huius, eius from genitive singular forms in -osio- (cognate to Sanskrit -asya-) questioning the validity of the loss of -s- in this phonetic context (10). The references mentioned in favor of the hypothesis are Leumann, 1977, p. 477 and Meiser, 1998, p. 117.

I haven't read a source yet that directly discusses the forms with vocalic/syllabic -i- such as unius; it's my assumption that they would in some way be related to cuius, huius, eius.

The origin of the final -s is another difficult point; it has been explained as an added element by analogy with genitives in /s/ (as in nouns of the third declension or archaically in the first declension).

| improve this answer | |
  • 3
    The mnemonic I learned for the adjectives was UNUS NAUTA (ullus, nullus, unus, solus, neuter, alter, uter, totus, alius). – Draconis Oct 25 at 17:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.