I'm reading the beginning of St. Augustine's Confessions (Liber I Caput I), and had some trouble translating the word circumferens. How would you translate it?

magnus es, domine, et laudabilis valde. magna virtus tua et sapientiae tuae non est numerus. et laudare te vult homo, aliqua portio creaturae tuae, et homo circumferens mortalitatem suam, circumferens testimonium peccati sui et testimonium quia superbis resistis; et tamen laudare te vult homo, aliqua portio creaturae tuae.

Great you are, Lord, and very praiseworthy: great is your virtue, and of your wisdom there is no number. And this man wishes to praise you, to some extent a part of your creation, and this man carrying about him a testimony of his own sin and a testimony that you resist the proud; and yet this man wishes to praise you, to some extent a part of your creation.

I'm afraid my translation might not read very well, so any other tips would be appreciated. Also, why is the demonstrative this implied with homo? I couldn't figure that one out.

  • 1
    Why do you think "this" is implied? Just after the portion you quoted, Augustine has his famous "fecisti nos ad te," so I don't think he's just talking about himself.
    – brianpck
    Apr 24 '20 at 23:54
  • @brianpck Oh, thanks for the comment. I was referring to another English translation to see how the translator translated "homo", and they used the word this. That's why.
    – ktm5124
    Apr 25 '20 at 0:02
  • Your translation is extremely literal. There's nothing wrong with this if you are using it as a crib for the Latin, but if you want it to stand alone in English, I could suggest some more idiomatic expressions.
    – Figulus
    Apr 25 '20 at 5:54
  • I can also add that you seem to have overlooked translating mortalitatem suam.
    – Figulus
    Apr 25 '20 at 5:55

At the risk of sounding like I'm suggesting some schoolboy calque, I think translating circumferens as "carrying around" is pretty spot on. Man is carrying around his mortality and his various testimonies.

I don't think you need the "this". I think that these gratuitous thises were a common idiom in 19th century English. I don't hear them much in more recent literature.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.