Latin Language Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for linguists, teachers, and students wanting to discuss the finer points of the Latin language. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
Spinoza, Ethics, De Deo, Propositio 15, Scholium:
Sane rerum quae realiter ab invicem distinctae sunt, una sine alia esse et in suo statu manere potest
Is rerum partitive genitive and is it correct to rearrange the sentence in this manner?
Sane una rerum quae realiter ab invicem distinctae sunt, sine alia esse et in suo statu manere potest
Otherwise, which type of genitive corresponds to rerum?
Yes, this does indeed appear to be a partitive genitive. Changing the word order as you suggest is legitimate if it helps you. I think it is most useful in its original place where una and sine alia are next to each other.
I like analyzing things sequentially, so let us start with the whole sentence. To clarify the role of the relative clause, I will add another comma:
Sane rerum, quae realiter ab invicem distinctae sunt, una sine alia esse et in suo statu manere potest.
To better grasp the core message, we can ignore the relative clause which gives additional detail:
Sane rerum una sine alia esse et in suo statu manere potest.
Let me also drop the other half of what can be done:
Sane rerum una sine alia esse potest.
Now the message is clear:
Clearly one of the things can exist without another.
If there are only two things, then "the other" is better than "another".
