Etymologists/Linguists posit that the prefix for gold in Proto-Indo-European was:


Which gave way to *auzom in Proto-Italic languages and ausum in Classical Latin.

At some point, ausum morphed into aurum.

What would be the cause of the change from /s/ to /r/, considering the phonemes are very different?

  • 1
    Possible duplicate of Rhotacism: why?
    – Asteroides
    Commented Oct 16, 2019 at 21:40
  • @sumelic I wouldn't actually consider this a duplicate. This is more like a prequel question to the other one; the answer here is that rhotacism causes the change, whereas the linked question studies the reasons for rhotacism. Also, duplicate questions should ask the same thing, not just end up having the same answer. (But as always, I have nothing against others opining and voting against me.)
    – Joonas Ilmavirta
    Commented Oct 17, 2019 at 17:46

1 Answer 1


This is a sound change called rhotacism, one of the better-attested Latin sound changes.

Back in Old Latin times, we see a phoneme /s/ showing up all over the place. For example, the stem for "flower" is flos-, which means its nominative is flos-s (which becomes flos), its genitive is flos-is, and its accusative is flos-em. And the infinitive is regularly formed with a suffix -se (extrapolated from an old S-stem noun), as in es-se, amā-se, amāvis-se.

Somewhere in there, this phoneme got voiced to [z] when it appears between two vowels and isn't geminated. This was still written with the letter S.

But then, this [z] got lenited to [ɹ], an approximant like the R-sound in Midwestern American English. This was the same as the letter the Romans wrote R at the time, so the two merged together. Later, this merged sound turned into a trill [r]. (Or maybe R was already a trill, and [z] merged into it later. It's hard to tell.)

So now what happened to those words? Suddenly the paradigms became less regular: flos, but floris, florem; esse, amāvisse, but amāre. This is presumably also what happened to ausum: it became aurum.

Then, to fill in the gap left by the vanishing S, a double /ss/ got shortened to /s/ after long vowels. So now S can appear between vowels again, and you get the state of affairs seen in Classical times.

(Note that all phonetics given here are speculative, since we have no recordings of native speakers of Old Latin to compare against. But they're relatively confident speculations.)

  • A good answer. S also rhotacised to r in North Germanic languages, though in a different context (final rather than intervocalic). eg Old Norse "dagr" from Proto-Germanic "*dagaz".
    – Colin Fine
    Commented Oct 17, 2019 at 10:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.