What are New Latin's comma rules?

Specifically, where do New Latin's comma rules differ from modern English's comma rules (e.g., as documented in the 16th ed. of the Chicago Manual of Style §§6.15-6.53)?

For example, I frequently see a comma between id and quod ("that which"), as in this:

Potentiale receptivum vocabimus id, quod utrumque punctum recipit tempore t
(by physicist Carl Neumann 1868, p. 121)

I've even seen this in Renaissance era Latin and earlier Latin, too.

This is something that would never be done with English comma rules.

  • 1
    Great! Unfortunately I don't know the answer, but I'm confident somebody on the site will! (Also, welcome!) – Joel Derfner Jun 29 '16 at 0:02
  • 1
    In my (impressionistic) experience, modern 'critical' editions of classical and medieval texts use commas with different degrees of frequency. German editors, perhaps, punctuate more because German has a stricter need to mark off subordinate clauses (because, say, they also suspend verbs to the ends of clauses). What is 'New Latin', though? – jon Jul 10 '16 at 19:26
  • 1
    @jon New Latin is, according to this site, "Latin in the modern era, approximately 1400–1900." – Geremia Nov 19 '16 at 17:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.