Timeline for Use of circumflex in Latin: Is there a difference between "hora" and "horâ"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2020 at 8:26 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Sep 4, 2018 at 15:45 | vote | accept | Geremia | ||
| Jul 8, 2017 at 21:43 | comment | added | cnread | Just to point out that the occasional circumflex shows up even in some 'scholarly' editions of texts, especially to distinguish perfect tense forms that look like present tense forms. Just the other day, I came across abît in Mynors's 1963 Oxford Classical Text edition of Pliny the Younger's Letters (letter 2.1.7). I had to triple-check and even take out a magnifying glass to make sure it wasn't just a stray bit of ink. | |
| Jul 8, 2017 at 20:41 | comment | added | Rafael | +1 for underlining diacritical marks can be omitted (thus hora could be ambiguous) | |
| Jul 8, 2017 at 20:18 | history | answered | Asteroides | CC BY-SA 3.0 |