Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 31, 2023 at 20:39 comment added Cairnarvon @LanguageEnthusiast No subject is explicitly expressed. Going by the previous verses, presumably God (deus noster, 'our god', masculine, in Baruch 38:6, who is also the implicit subject of at least tradidit in Baruch 38:7) rather than wisdom (viam disciplinae, lit. 'the way of instruction', in Baruch 38:7; both via and disciplina are feminine).
May 31, 2023 at 19:52 comment added Language Enthusiast Okay. Thank you. And, what is the subject in this verse? "post haec in terris visus est et cum hominibus conversatus est"
May 31, 2023 at 19:40 comment added Cairnarvon @LanguageEnthusiast Yes. That's unambiguously not what the Latin says; in the Latin the subject is inescapably masculine.
May 31, 2023 at 19:15 comment added Language Enthusiast Okay. Since I am completely new to Latin I have difficulty wrapping my head around the language and its grammatical rules. So kindly excuse me if I sound repetitive " Will it be a mistake if this sentence ("post haec in terris visus est et cum hominibus conversatus est") is transliterated as "After these things she appeared on earth and dwelt with men" ?
May 31, 2023 at 18:07 comment added Cairnarvon @LanguageEnthusiast It's hard to see what the antecedent would be if the subject were masculine.
May 31, 2023 at 13:07 comment added Language Enthusiast Thank you very much for your answer. So, can it be concluded that the use of "He" in the Latin Vulgate for this sentence is wrong ?
May 30, 2023 at 22:19 history answered Cairnarvon CC BY-SA 4.0