Skip to main content
added 2 characters in body
Source Link
d_e
  • 11.8k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 43

Review of "Res pulchrae intellegendus sunt"

First, the gerundive, like regular adjective, should match its subject in gender, case and number. In that case res is f. pl. nom., so that yields: "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt". Second, I think you are right to feel the sound is somewhat not what you are aiming to. The tone of "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt"is usually rather: "beautiful things should(must) be understood" than "they exist in order to ..."

Suggestion

There might be several ways to render "exists", depends on context. I suggest to use here a passive participle. A possible candidate would be creatae (*). To express purpose, or the infinitive"infinitive" of reason we may use several different constructions (also). Here, we are dealing with passive infinitive, so we can chose ut+subj format, we will end up with (the word-order is quite flexible):

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur creatae sunt.

Or, instead creatae, to simply use the the verb exsisto:

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur exsistunt.


(*) One may raise some valid philosophical argument against this selection, but "(in order)to be understood" is, for me at least, makes it good fit).

Review of "Res pulchrae intellegendus sunt"

First, the gerundive, like regular adjective, should match its subject in gender, case and number. In that case res is f. pl. nom., so that yields: "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt". Second, I think you are right to feel the sound is somewhat not what you are aiming to. The tone of "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt"is usually rather: "beautiful things should(must) be understood" than "they exist in order to ..."

Suggestion

There might be several ways to render "exists", depends on context. I suggest to use here a passive participle. A possible candidate would be creatae (*). To express purpose, or the infinitive of reason we may use several different constructions (also). Here, we are dealing with passive infinitive, so we can chose ut+subj format, we will end up with (the word-order is quite flexible):

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur creatae sunt.

Or, instead creatae, to simply use the the verb exsisto:

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur exsistunt.


(*) One may raise some valid philosophical argument against this selection, but "(in order)to be understood" is, for me at least, makes it good fit).

Review of "Res pulchrae intellegendus sunt"

First, the gerundive, like regular adjective, should match its subject in gender, case and number. In that case res is f. pl. nom., so that yields: "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt". Second, I think you are right to feel the sound is somewhat not what you are aiming to. The tone of "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt"is usually rather: "beautiful things should(must) be understood" than "they exist in order to ..."

Suggestion

There might be several ways to render "exists", depends on context. I suggest to use here a passive participle. A possible candidate would be creatae (*). To express purpose, or the "infinitive" of reason we may use several different constructions (also). Here, we are dealing with passive infinitive, so we can chose ut+subj format, we will end up with (the word-order is quite flexible):

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur creatae sunt.

Or, instead creatae, to simply use the the verb exsisto:

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur exsistunt.


(*) One may raise some valid philosophical argument against this selection, but "(in order)to be understood" is, for me at least, makes it good fit).

deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
d_e
  • 11.8k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 43

Review of "Res pulchrae intellegendus sunt"

First, the gerundive, like regular adjective, should match its subject in gender, case and number. In that case res is f. pl. nom., so that yields: "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt". Second, I think you are right to feel the sound is somewhat not what you are aiming to. The tone of "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt"is usually rather: "beautiful things should(must) be understood" than "they exist in order to ..."

Suggestion

There might be several ways to render "exists", depends on context. I suggest to use here a passive participle. A possible candidate would be creatae (*). To express purpose, or the infinitive of reason we may use several different constructions (also). Here, we are dealing with passive infinitive, so we can chose ut+subj format, we will end up with (the word-order is quite flexible):

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur creatae sunt.

Or, instead creatae, to simply use the the verb exsisto:

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur exsistunt.


(*) One may raise some valid philosophical argument against this selection, but "(in order)to be understood" is, for me at least, makes it good fit).

Review of "Res pulchrae intellegendus sunt"

First, the gerundive, like regular adjective, should match its subject in gender, case and number. In that case res is f. pl. nom., so that yields: "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt". Second, I think you are right to feel the sound is somewhat not what you are aiming to. The tone of "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt"is usually rather: "beautiful things should(must) be understood" than "they exist in order to ..."

Suggestion

There might be several ways to render "exists", depends on context. I suggest to use here a passive participle. A possible candidate would be creatae (*). To express purpose, or the infinitive of reason we may use several different constructions (also). Here, we are dealing with passive infinitive, so we can chose ut+subj format, we will end up with (the word-order is quite flexible):

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur creatae sunt.


(*) One may raise some valid philosophical argument against this selection, but "(in order)to be understood" is, for me at least, makes it good fit).

Review of "Res pulchrae intellegendus sunt"

First, the gerundive, like regular adjective, should match its subject in gender, case and number. In that case res is f. pl. nom., so that yields: "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt". Second, I think you are right to feel the sound is somewhat not what you are aiming to. The tone of "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt"is usually rather: "beautiful things should(must) be understood" than "they exist in order to ..."

Suggestion

There might be several ways to render "exists", depends on context. I suggest to use here a passive participle. A possible candidate would be creatae (*). To express purpose, or the infinitive of reason we may use several different constructions (also). Here, we are dealing with passive infinitive, so we can chose ut+subj format, we will end up with (the word-order is quite flexible):

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur creatae sunt.

Or, instead creatae, to simply use the the verb exsisto:

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur exsistunt.


(*) One may raise some valid philosophical argument against this selection, but "(in order)to be understood" is, for me at least, makes it good fit).

deleted 2 characters in body
Source Link
d_e
  • 11.8k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 43

Review of "Res pulchrae intellegendus sunt"

First, the gerundive, like regular adjective, should match its subject in gender, case and number. In that case res is f. pl. nom., so that yields: "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt". Second, I think you are right to feel the sound is somewhat not what you are aiming to. The flavortone of "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt"is usually rather: "beautiful things should(must) be understood" than "they exist in order to ..."

Suggestion

There might be several ways to render "exists", depends on context. I suggest to use here a passive participle. A possible candidate would be creatae (*). To express purpose, or the infinitive of reason we may use several different constructions (also). Here, we are dealing with passive infinitive, so we can chose ut+subj format, we will end up with (the word-order is quite flexible):

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur creatae sunt.


(*) One may raise some valid philosophical argument against this selection, but "(in order)to be understood" is, for me at least, makes it good fit).

Review of "Res pulchrae intellegendus sunt"

First, the gerundive, like regular adjective, should match its subject in gender, case and number. In that case res is f. pl. nom., so that yields: "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt". Second, I think you are right to feel the sound is somewhat not what you are aiming to. The flavor of "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt"is usually rather: "beautiful things should(must) be understood" than "they exist in order to ..."

Suggestion

There might be several ways to render "exists", depends on context. I suggest to use here a passive participle. A possible candidate would be creatae (*). To express purpose, or the infinitive of reason we may use several different constructions (also). Here, we are dealing with passive infinitive, so we can chose ut+subj format, we will end up with (the word-order is quite flexible):

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur creatae sunt.


(*) One may raise some valid philosophical argument against this selection, but "(in order)to be understood" is, for me at least, makes it good fit).

Review of "Res pulchrae intellegendus sunt"

First, the gerundive, like regular adjective, should match its subject in gender, case and number. In that case res is f. pl. nom., so that yields: "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt". Second, I think you are right to feel the sound is somewhat not what you are aiming to. The tone of "Res pulchrae intellegendae sunt"is usually rather: "beautiful things should(must) be understood" than "they exist in order to ..."

Suggestion

There might be several ways to render "exists", depends on context. I suggest to use here a passive participle. A possible candidate would be creatae (*). To express purpose, or the infinitive of reason we may use several different constructions (also). Here, we are dealing with passive infinitive, so we can chose ut+subj format, we will end up with (the word-order is quite flexible):

Res pulchrae ut intellegantur creatae sunt.


(*) One may raise some valid philosophical argument against this selection, but "(in order)to be understood" is, for me at least, makes it good fit).

Post Undeleted by d_e
added 55 characters in body
Source Link
d_e
  • 11.8k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 43
Loading
Rollback to Revision 2
Source Link
d_e
  • 11.8k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 43
Loading
deleted 1043 characters in body
Source Link
d_e
  • 11.8k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 43
Loading
Post Deleted by d_e
deleted 7 characters in body
Source Link
d_e
  • 11.8k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 43
Loading
Source Link
d_e
  • 11.8k
  • 2
  • 23
  • 43
Loading