Timeline for Livy Book 1 27.1 type of subjunctive, sequence of tenses
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 9, 2020 at 21:20 | history | edited | Sebastian Koppehel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Apr 9, 2020 at 20:49 | comment | added | Sebastian Koppehel | @MartinO'Reilly The distinction may be lost in translation, yes. I extended the answer to add a short discussion of how to deal with this when translating. (I also removed the term "factual quod" as it is apparently not the correct term here.) | |
| Apr 9, 2020 at 20:48 | history | edited | Sebastian Koppehel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1116 characters in body
|
| Apr 9, 2020 at 9:53 | comment | added | tony | @Martin O'Reilly: Are you familiar with epistemic modality? See Cerberus & cnread in Q: latin.stackexchange.com/q/5575/1982. | |
| Apr 9, 2020 at 8:54 | comment | added | Martin O'Reilly | Thank you so much Sebastian for a very comprehensive answer. Your link to the other question was particularly helpful. Am I right in saying that one can only know from the Latin (not the translation) whether the 'quod' is factual or not.? | |
| Apr 8, 2020 at 18:31 | history | answered | Sebastian Koppehel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |